David Bruce Collins—the Official Site
  • Index
  • Blog
  • Biography
  • Writing
    • Novels in Print
    • Eastern Daylight (1997) >
      • Eastern Daylight: April
      • Eastern Daylight: May
      • Eastern Daylight: June
      • Eastern Daylight: July
      • Eastern Daylight: August
      • Eastern Daylight: September
      • Eastern Daylight: October
    • Bite-Size Hungarian
  • Politics
    • Life As a Green
    • Ten Key Values of GPUS (English)
    • Issues (2014)
  • County Gov't
  • Web Links

On GND, Radical IS Reasonable, Mr. Tomlinson

28/1/2019

2 Comments

 
Remember when the business section of your local paper had several pages of stock quotes from the various stock exchanges, the options market, etc.? Wait, perhaps I should take a step back...remember when we still had newspapers?

With our digital subscription, we receive the print edition of the Houston Chronicle every Sunday, and it's kind of sad. With a cover price of US $4.00, it is pretty skimpy compared to the 50-cent Sunday editions I remember from my youth. And half of its thickness is blow-in advertising supplements. (Since our subscription costs $14.00 a month, that price is reduced to $3.50 per issue in a typical four-Sunday month. It also includes the online edition, which has been troublesome lately, but that's a story for another time.)

In my youth, the only real reason I ever looked at the business section of the paper was to see the share price of companies I found interesting, such as my stepfather's employer. I certainly didn't pick it to read the articles, which were chloroform in print.

But now I'm older and harder to put to sleep with mere words.

I like reading the works of the Chronicle's business columnist Chris Tomlinson. He frequently makes points with which I agree. I find that weird, but encouraging. Tomlinson is certainly no flaming lefty, more of a common-sense conservative: In almost every column, he displays an uncanny ability to NOT spout orthodox classical econ talking points and base his punditry on  actual facts.

Therefore, Tomlinson's column from yesterday's edition didn't merely disappoint me. It infuriated me.
See if you can find the phrase in the first two paragraphs that infuriated me the most:
The United States needs a Green New Deal, but totalitarian environmentalists with little comprehension of free-market economics or energy industry realities should not dictate the terms.
​
Liberals and conservatives, capitalists and communists, the rich and the poor all need to join the debate to define what a Green New Deal should include. Failing to engage now in devising a strategy to mitigate climate change, while also addressing income inequality, will cede too much territory to radicals on all sides.
If you guessed "totalitarian environmentalists," treat yourself to a full-body massage.

While I agree with the second paragraph in its entirety, it overlooks something important: THE GREEN NEW DEAL IS VERY MUCH ABOUT "ADDRESSING INCOME INEQUALITY," YOU OTHERWISE REASONABLE AND KNOWLEDGEABLE PERSON!!! We can and must transition to renewable energy and the other aspects of the GND (e.g., localized urban food webs) both swiftly and justly, which includes providing employment and training for everyone who can and wants to work.

This paragraph beggars belief, illustrating as it does that Mr. Tomlinson Just. Doesn't. Get. It:
These groups also want a Green New Deal that keeps fossil fuels in the ground, bans the export of fossil fuels and pursues "a managed decline of fossil fuel production.” Apparently, the hundreds of thousands of families that depend on the $715 billion spent annually on oil and natural gas do not matter.
There's a reason for using the phrase "managed decline" rather than "immediate cessation." Tomlinson falls into a common rhetorical pit here, whining that all those gigawatts of fossil power will be lost, never to be replaced with power from renewable sources or conservation—as if the big energy companies could never be mobilized to develop renewables. As for whether fossil-fuel families matter to climate activists, wanting to maintain a habitable world for all earthlings beyond 2030 reflects that they do indeed.

It gives us lefties no great joy to know that we have a dozen years or so to bring about a massive reduction in fossil fuel extraction and consumption, that this can only be accomplished by opening entire cases of whoop-ass on our corporate overlords, and that ordinary people may be hurt as a result of the process of saving the world. Re-creating systems to make big business more accountable to People and Planet is not totalitarianism; it is liberation.


A big lesson we learn from our socialist view of history is that the state must do what the private sector cannot or will not. Apart from protecting us from stupidity and greed, whether that of others or our own, that is the state's main purpose.

Tomlinson goes on to mention how Thomas Friedman put the phrase Green New Deal into common parlance via a column he wrote way back in 2007. Yes, that's a solid four years before the phrase became part of Jill Stein's first presidential run began. While Stein may have appropriated the phrase, wittingly or not, her version of the GND looks very different. Tomlinson bows to mainstream-media orthodoxy by not even mentioning that the GND was the basis of two successive Green Party presidential campaign.

Such omissions have already become so common that they scarcely bother me any more. But professional analysts should stop pretending (a) that Democrats invented it, and (b) that groups like the Sunrise Movement have no understanding of how legislation and the economy work in the real world. The main problem with both our Congress and our economy is that they don't work for ordinary people.

I invite Tomlinson, and anyone else, to peruse the Green New Deal page of Stein's campaign website for a primer on how this program works in the world we envision.

I have gone back and read Friedman's seminal column on that topic, and it's exactly what we've come to expect from Ol' Tom: neo-liberal dreck. He was—and, I believe, still is—convinced that corporate behemoths will take climate science seriously, recognize that they cannot continue making money extracting fuels from an overheated and uninhabitable planet, and do the right thing out of the goodness of their teeny-tiny hearts. Oh, and the government should encourage their such altruistic behavior through a combination of tasty carrots and gently applied sticks.

What was it that Upton Sinclair said about when a person's salary depends on not understanding something? I believe that the aphorism applies as much to establishment propagandists like Friedman as to the CEO of ExxonMobil.

Naomi Klein has devoted several books and a sizable chunk of her career to demonstrating that the free market is never really free and can seldom be counted on to do what is best for People and Planet. It needs a very non-Invisible Hand to guide it. This is not to say that Klein, Richard Wolff, and other progressive big-thinkers are indisputably correct in their conclusions, but it would do the Tomlinsons and Friedmans of the world a great deal of good to read and understand their theories and the reasoning beneath them. If mainstream columnists care to critique those writings, they'll have to do much better than saying, "This doesn't square with the prevailing economic paradigm, so it must be wrong."

Perhaps then Tomlinson, Friedman, et al would understand why the Sunrisers are pushing the GND with such urgency: They know the stakes. And they know that the current system is not just ineffective, but is in fact standing in the way of world-saving reforms.

Meanwhile, if anybody knows of a business-section columnist for a metropolitan daily who writes from a perspective not steeped in orthodox pro-capitalist dogma, please throw some links my way. I'm not giving up on Tomlinson yet, but overcoming that dogma isn't easy.

2 Comments
SocraticGadfly
29/1/2019 18:38:34

Chris also takes at face value eXXXon's commitment to a carbon tax. The only real way it will commit is if it can skunk it up enough to make it unworkable, or else too small, or a bit of both.

Reply
dbc
30/1/2019 08:12:47

Agreed. It's understandable that he would be sympathetic and credulous toward the energy industry "home team"—after all, Big Energy is making huge strides toward sustainability with the <1% of their annual expenditures on renewable-energy R&D that they trumpet in their TV and newspaper ads. It's understandable, but in my Little Green Book not excusable. ExxonMobil et al are deep into late-stage desperation plays like fracking and deepwater drilling (which they continue to trumpet for their shareholders).

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    DBC Sez...

    Here you will find political campaign-related entries, as well as some about my literature, Houston underground arts, peace & justice, urban cycling, soccer, alt-religion, and other topics.

    Categories

    All
    2018
    ACORN
    Affordable Care Act
    Ahmad Hassan
    Ajamu Baraka
    Alabama
    Al Gore
    Amazon
    Approval Voting
    Art Car Parade
    Ballot Access
    Bernie Sanders
    Black Agenda Report
    #BlackLivesMatter
    B&N
    Book Review
    Brains And Eggs
    Breast Cancer
    Burning Man
    Caitlin Johnstone
    Caleb Alexander
    Campaign
    Campaign 2018
    Candidates' Forum
    Candidate Workshop
    Catastrophic Theatre
    Cenk Uygur
    Cheri Honkala
    Chicago
    Choir
    Chris Hedges
    Chuck Kuffner
    City Council
    Climate Change
    Climate March
    Colin Kaepernick
    Convention
    Corporatocracy
    County Clerk
    County Judge
    Cover Design
    Cycling
    Dan Monahan
    Darryl Cherney
    David Cobb
    David Rovics
    Death By Cop
    Death Penalty
    Debates
    Deep State
    #DemEnter
    Demexit
    #DemExit
    Depression
    Donald Trump
    #DownticketGreens
    DSA
    Duopoly
    Dwight Boykins
    Early Voting
    Earth Day
    Earthworm
    Eastern Daylight
    Ecological Wisdom
    Economic Justice
    Ed Emmett
    Egberto WIllies
    Eleanor Goldfield
    Election 2015
    Election 2016
    Election 2017
    Election 2018
    Election 2020
    Electoral College
    Elvis Costello
    Emancipation Park
    Emily Sanchez
    Emily Sanchez
    Endorsements
    Energy
    Environment
    Erika Martinez
    Fiction
    Film Review
    Fourth Turning
    Francesca Fiorentini
    Full Frontal
    Fundraising
    Gary Johnson
    Gary Stuard
    Gerrymandering
    Glenn Greenwald
    Gray Matters
    #GreenEnter
    Green Party
    Greenwatch TV
    Gun Violence
    Hal Ridley Jr.
    Harris County
    HAUS
    HAUS Project
    HCGP
    Hillary Clinton
    HMS
    Homelessness
    Houston
    Houston Area Progressives
    Houston Astros
    Houston Dash
    Houston Dynamo
    Houston Fringe Festival
    Hurricane Harvey
    Immigration
    Instant Runoff Voting
    International Affairs
    Inverted Totalitarianism
    Iran
    IRV
    IUniverse
    Janis RIchards
    Jan RIchards
    Jill Stein
    Jimmy Dore
    Jonathan Franzen
    JosH Darr
    Juneteenth
    Justice
    Kenneth Kendrick
    Kenneth Mejia
    Kent Mesplay
    Keystone XL
    Key Values
    KPFT
    Laredo
    Last Week Tonight
    Late-Stage Capitalism
    League Of Women Voters
    Lee Camp
    Libertarian Party
    Lina Hidalgo
    Local Democracy
    Maine
    #MarchForOurLives
    March For Science
    March On The Pentagon
    Margaret Flowers
    Marijuana
    Martina Salinas
    Mass Shootings
    Mayor
    Media
    Medicare For All
    Mental Health
    Metro
    Mudslinging
    Naomi Klein
    NationBuilder
    Net Neutrality
    New Orleans
    New Zealand
    NORML
    North Carolina
    Our Revolution
    Outlander
    Outreach
    Overdevelopment
    Pacifica
    Parkland FL
    Paul Ingmundson
    PDiddie
    Pennsylvania
    Platform
    Plutocracy
    PNC
    Police
    Politics Done Right
    Polls
    Progressivism
    Proofreading
    Puerto Rico
    Ranked Choice Voting
    Recount 2016
    Remington Alessi
    #Resistance
    Revolution
    Russiagate
    Samantha Bee
    San Antonio
    School Shootings
    Scotland
    Scottish National Party
    Scott McLarty
    Sema Hernandez
    Sheila Jackson Lee
    Single Payer
    SKCM Curry
    Smart Growth
    Socialism
    Socialist Alternative
    Spoiler Effect
    Straight Party Voting
    Strauss & Howe
    Sylvester Turner
    Syria
    Tax Policy
    Ted Cruz
    Texas House
    Texas Leftist
    Texas Progressive
    Texoblogosphere
    Texpatriate
    The Intercept
    The North Star
    Third Parties
    Thom Hartmann
    Traffic
    Transit
    Treason
    Turnout
    Urbanism
    UU
    Van Cliburn
    Vanessa Edwards Foster
    Vish
    War On Drugs
    Website
    World Cup
    World Naked Bike Ride

    Archives

    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly